News from CSOs

On 07.04.2025, as part of the World Good Deeds Day 2025, a Volunteer Environmental Action was held in the area of ​​Prilep Lake in Prilep.

The activity was implemented with the support of 20 volunteer students from the Primary School “Dobre Jovanoski” and high school students from the youth clubs of the Association LET Station, who jointly cleaned the area around Prilep Lake and collected solid waste, showing that the spirit of volunteerism is still among us, but it needs to be nurtured and emphasized, so that we would live in a better and more harmonious community.

Good Deeds Day is an international day of volunteering. Starting in 2007, its mission is to unite people from all over the world in doing good deeds for others and for the planet. The goal of the event is for young people to learn about volunteering and to be involved in volunteer activities for the good of the entire community.

Our Association, last year for the first time joined the global movement “Day of Good Deeds”, which is the International Day of Volunteering. This year, the Day of Good Deeds is April 6th, and various events and workshops will be organized at the state level, organized by the Youth Cultural Center Bitola.

#gooddeedsday

#деннадобридела

#mkcbitola

@MkcBitola

@Gooddeddsday

Fact-checking is essential, but insufficient on its own. A multi-layered approach is needed, one that combines fact-checking and media literacy with cooperation between the media, non-governmental organizations, and government institutions. In other words, a comprehensive, whole-of-society approach to combating disinformation. This was one of the main ideas that emerged during the second part of the conference titled “Together for Truth: Whole-of-Society Approach to Safeguard Democracy,” organized by the Metamorphosis Foundation on the occasion of International Fact-Checking Day.
The session titled “Democracy at Risk: Fact-Checking and Content Moderation on Social Media—Facing Challenges by Creating Enabling Environment” discussed the state of fact-checking in the Western Balkans. Jona Plumbi, from the fact-checking organization Faktoje, noted that Albania is particularly vulnerable to disinformation.
“We are not prepared to combat disinformation. We are trying to prepare for the parliamentary elections in May, but it is not enough. A multifaceted approach to the problem is needed,” Plumbi said.
That is why, as Plumbi noted, Faktoje has started a collaboration with the University of Tirana to integrate media literacy into education, as the level of media literacy is very low. Plumbi also addressed another problem, how to reach an audience that is not interested in accurate information, that is, those who consume short content such as that found on TikTok. “When we wrote long analyses about disinformation regarding migrants in Albania, was anyone interested? No. We reached the most activity on 40-second videos,” Plumbi said.
Maida Ćulahović, from “Why Not” in Bosnia and Herzegovina, followed up with their own experience. Through the fact-checking services “Istinomer” and “Raskrinkavanje”, they tried to address the problem together with the platforms by following the code of practice, but without success:
“Without clear legislation, the platforms will do nothing, i.e. they will not voluntarily implement measures to address disinformation. During the last elections, we tried to work with the platforms for posts and content that violate the code of conduct [of Meta’s platforms], illegal content or one that contradicts the electoral code, and there was very little responsiveness. Out of 119 reported content, we received a response for only 25 of them. And only 3 were removed, but only after we appealed the initial decision,” shared Ćulahović.
Nacho Strigulev, from Blue Link, Bulgaria, followed up on the same topic, saying that we cannot rely on platforms to defend the information space, because they are, at the end of the day, profit-oriented companies:
“Platforms have no problem transforming themselves into weapons against democracy and the democratic order because such content brings clicks and interaction with the content. On the other hand, they make a profit through it.”
Strigulev further mentioned that such algorithms are everywhere and quoted Alexandra Giese, saying that such algorithms [e.g. “For You” pages] should be regulated, and turned off during election periods. Strigulev also drew attention to various chatbots that use artificial intelligence (AI) technology, and said that between 6 and 50 percent share disinformation that we know is linked to the Kremlin, including sharing sources from the “Pravda” network of pages. The network published an astronomical 3.6 million articles in 2024 alone.
The last speaker was Despina Kovachevska, from the Metamorphosis Foundation, and she concluded this discussion with a critical examination of hate speech and its relationship to disinformation:
“Hate speech justifies disinformation, increases stigma and bias. Especially when we have unprofessional media outlets that chase clicks and profit instead of thoroughly checking the facts, then I have a big problem,” Kovachevska shared.
In the end, there was a consensus that the Digital Services Act is the best path to harmonizing the domestic laws in the process of accession to the European Union. This process should not be done pro forma, but should be an inclusive and transparent process, especially if we want the big platforms to take this region more seriously–the speakers agreed.

The last session of the first day of the Metamorphosis International Conference, photo: Vancho Dzambaski
Business, sometimes, knows how to show integrity
The final discussion of the conference focused on “The Business Case for Information Integrity.” Opening remarks were given by the moderator of the discussion, Dragan Kremer, a media expert, who highlighted several examples from both Serbia and the United Kingdom, especially from the Sun newspaper and the Breitbart website in the United States, which have started to lose advertisers (i.e. companies that advertise in their media outlets) due to the content they publish. The companies have publicly renounced advertising, which they have also used as a kind of PR tool to present the values ​​they stand behind. That is, the values ​​they do not want to support or be associated with at all, such as those presented by Breitbart and the Sun, which have been spreading disinformation, racist, and xenophobic content.
Rasha Nedeljkov, the program director of Serbia’s Crta, followed up with the example of Happy TV, where almost the same thing happened. Several brands have canceled their advertisements from media outlets that very clearly share fake news and manipulated content–​​especially content related to the war in Ukraine.
However, the impact is not limited to domestic companies and brands only, it extends to international ones. Marko Milosavljević, a professor at the University of Ljubljana, explains that ads from international advertisers can be a double-edged sword.
“Just as this works for companies that fight against problematic content, there are also those that promote hate speech. What will happen in the EU and the Western Balkans, will major platforms start shutting down ads from media outlets that advocate for fact-checking, transparency and accuracy? There will be huge consequences for the media ecosystem,” Milosavljević pointed out.
He shared the example of companies that disagree with the policies of the Donald Trump administration and may be intimidated into reducing their advertising, and the money may be redirected to media outlets that spread disinformation and “stir up panic.”
Maja Sever, President of the European Journalist Federation, referred to other advertising from states and governments themselves, which can be the largest source of income for media outlets. According to Sever, there are no transparent criteria for government advertising, as shown in the research, where public funds are concentrated in just a few established media outlets, while independent media outlets receive not “a single denar.”
“This is due not so much to the content they publish, but to the editorial independence that the media outlets have. We need to find a way to establish responsible advertising as the norm, not the exception,” Sever said.
Vladimir Petreski, Editor-in-Chief of Truthmeter.mk, had the closing remarks. He emphasized that these things can be interpreted through the saying “vote with your wallet,” that is, to make choices according to what is most financially profitable. Petreski pointed to the example of X (formerly Twitter), saying:
“The company (X) has not recovered [financially] since Elon Musk took over. Companies began to collectively boycott content moderation decisions, after which Musk tried to sue advertisers.”
However, he emphasizes that the situation in Macedonia is different, because such a boycott can be (mis)used as a reason for a lawsuit, that is, it can be interpreted as an insult, damage to reputation, through so-called SLAPP lawsuits. On the other hand, another problem is the avalanche of digital and internet scams that have appeared across Macedonian social networks: “We see false advertisements and we see that they are in different languages ​​throughout the region, most often for medical drugs,” says Petreski. But the problem with scams is that immediately after they are reviewed, they disappear and new ones appear. This is an indicator that they have good channels where they can sell information to data brokers or simply steal money from users.

With the advent of the Internet and social networks, the number of information attacks has increased dramatically and their impact on democratic processes has become even more devastating. Elections, as an expensive and essential component of social life, are today one of the most vulnerable mechanisms in democratic societies–they are constantly under attack from both internal and external actors, as emphasized at the panel discussion.
Monitoring the information space is a constant struggle. Information threats have always been an obstacle to democracy and free and fair elections throughout human history. However, with the advent of the Internet and social networks, the number of information attacks has increased dramatically and their impact on democratic processes has become even more devastating. Elections, as an expensive and essential component of social life, are today one of the most vulnerable mechanisms in democratic societies –they are constantly under attack from internal and external actors.
These were the conclusions of the panel discussion titled “Democracy at Risk: Electoral Integrity VS. Information Threats–Western Balkans and EU, Experiences and Risk Mitigation” held today as part of the conference “Together for Truth: Whole-of-Society Approach to Safeguard Democracy.”
The panel discussion brought together speakers from several countries in the Western Balkans and the EU, who shared the experiences of their societies regarding the impact of information threats after democratic elections.
The tragedy in Kochani, which killed 59 young people, has encouraged PR and other mechanisms that political parties usually use before elections–spin, directing emotions, invoking rules and morality, ethics in the media, and even involving so-called “bot farms” with hate speech and threats. This was emphasized by the executive director of the Council of Media Ethics of Macedonia (SEMM), Biljana Georgievska.
According to her, this instrumentalization of the tragedy by the parties is done in collaboration with some of the traditional and online media outlets, which spread the narratives of the political parties without critical processing.
“The inclusion of all these mechanisms was a result of and initiated by the accident, and the timing appeared to be just right–6 months before the local elections, when an unofficial election campaign is starting to be conducted here,” said Georgievska.
As she added, not only did the tragedy not unite media outlets in a joint call for the safety of all citizens in this country in the future, but it also divided them over the extent of reporting on the tragedy.
“It has even gone to extremes–some demanding the complete removal of the cameras, supposedly protecting the privacy of the victims and families, while others are selling grief for likes and clicks,” added the executive director of SEMM.
The “PR factory” of all political parties has been unleashed with the risk of harming the integrity of the upcoming elections, Georgievska assessed.
She noted that without clear regulation, the electoral process will continue to be at risk and stressed that it is necessary to urgently review the Electoral Code and make a distinction between responsible and irresponsible media outlets.
Emilija Petreska-Kamenjarova from the Agency for Audio and Audiovisual Media Services (AVMU) pointed out that, although traditional media outlets are subject to monitoring and have clear rules, there are no precise guidelines for online campaigns.
In the last double elections (parliamentary and presidential) in the country, over 5 million seconds of radio and television advertising were monitored–a figure that, according to Petreska-Kamenjarova, speaks volumes about the amount of financial resources allocated for political advertising. However, there is almost no regulation in the digital space.
“That gap that exists is filled with a campaign that is continuously becoming more and more fierce. We are witnesses to this shift, we can see there are studies which clearly show that more and more campaigns are moving to the online space, with a particular surge of activity by officials on social networks during the campaign. That surge is so great that even ODIHR in its report on the previous elections said that clear rules should be applied in the Electoral Code on the participation of officials in campaigns on social networks,” said Petreska-Kamenjarova .
As she added, AVMU decided to initiate a code of conduct for online campaigns, but as a regulatory body, they cannot do it alone. They need cooperation with other stakeholders.

Photo: Vancho Dzambaski
Madalina Voinea from Expert Forum, Romania, shared her country’s experience with a candidate in last year’s presidential election who, despite a massive online campaign, failed to declare any expenses for it. She warned of the institutional failure to regulate the digital space and pointed to TikTok as “one of the most powerful tools for political communication” in Romania.
“There are many loopholes when it comes to allowing such campaigns to go viral. There are few measures to prevent such campaigns. What we found in our research was that around 30,000 profiles were activated since September–not just a month before the elections, but also after the elections. There is a lack of transparency when it comes to the financing of the ads. There is no information about how much was spent, about the name of the person who published the ad, and it was more difficult to determine the scope of the problem. We can only see the coordinated networks and we all know that this is a coordinated attempt to influence the information space,” Voinea emphasized.
She explained that many fake profiles were also created on social networks, which published satire and jokes on which the controversial candidate’s communication campaign was built.
“This was largely a campaign where the same sentences were used, with names and content that were ‘copy-pasted’. This was a clear indication that this was a coordinated campaign, but it was also unexpected. It was clear that it was being activated and deactivated. Since his candidacy was finally canceled, his official profile is completely different. Also, the number of such profiles has almost halved,” Voinea said.
She emphasized that before the elections, Romania did not have a single mechanism for dealing with such online threats, but after the elections, institutional capacity building and the adoption of practices similar to those in the EU began.
“We were polite to the platforms. It cost us a lot. It’s time to talk less about cooperation and more about alignment. Our future is at stake,” Voinea concluded.
Tamara Branković from CRTA, Serbia, said that, unlike other countries where foreign actors are accused of election interference, in Serbia the problem is “domestic” and “the state itself is the biggest source of manipulation and disinformation.”
“We are generally quite traditional in the way we inform, and the government and President Vučić use the media’s access to violate the constitution to centralize power. In 2024 alone, Vučić appeared more than 350 times live on television, with coverage and live broadcasts. Year after year, his television appearances are becoming more frequent,” Branković said.
She believes that it is crucial that citizens are given tools that will allow them to recognize that something is wrong with the electoral process, and that the EU must become more actively involved.
Фото: Ванчо Џамбаски
Bardhi Bakija of Sbunker, Kosovo, highlighted authoritarian trends and disinformation campaigns coming from the country’s borders, as he said, especially from the north, but also from global extremist narratives. His analyses shows that previously marginalized views, through social networks, are now becoming mainstream, especially among young people.
“Whatever our response to this, we need to consider how advanced the methods and strategies of these actors are. One of the biggest mistakes we can make here is to underestimate the disinformation campaigns, their methodology, their sophistication, and their ability to engage young audiences,” warned Bakija from Sbunker.
The panel was moderated by Nikola Petrovic from ISAC, Serbia, who emphasized that democracy is much more than free elections–it is a fight against threats that erode trust in institutions, especially when those threats come in the form of disinformation, covert manipulation and media spin.
The panel discussion ended with a clear message: democratic societies must be prepared, resilient, and informed to defend the truth and integrity of the electoral process.

Building bridges of cooperation. Sharing lessons from different experiences with malicious fake news. Creating strategic platforms. The necessity of strategic action. These are some of the main conclusions of the second session titled: “Geopolitical 360 on information threats – European learned lessons shared for the Western Balkans,” which was held within the framework of the international conference in Skopje organized by the Metamorphosis Foundation, writes Portalb.mk
Martha Turnbull, COI Director of the Hybrid Center of Excellence in Finland, said in her speech that in the last decade the center she represents has conducted numerous campaigns to combat disinformation.
“We see different actors sharing fake news, some of them coming from abroad, some from within countries. Russia still remains the main actor in the Euro-Atlantic region, but we also see actors from China. We see an increase in threats. We have cases where the Russians are creating centers in the country and then acting. Combating these activities is becoming a serious challenge that we need to work on, share information and protect ourselves in a synchronized way,” Turnbull said.
According to Beaudine Verhoek, from NATO’s Public Diplomacy Division, there are harmful threats, manipulative content, coordination, and deliberate manipulation.
“We are highlighting what information we need to respond to and act on. NATO and allies will continue to cooperate with each other, to counter in a timely manner. We have a strategic concept in both Chinese and Russian, to be present for audiences who speak the same language. If we do not tell our story, others will tell it for us. We have launched a campaign in Ukraine and we are supporting it continuously,” Verhoek emphasized, adding that strategic communications should be a pillar of the fight against disinformation.
“No one can act alone. We also have many partners. Today’s conference is important, to exchange lessons learned, to help each other,” added the guest .
Sanda Svetoka, a senior NATO StratCom expert from Latvia, highlighted the experiences from her analysis in her speech.
“We have always been on Russia’s radar, but that has not taught us much about how to deal with these issues. We have created a knowledge base about the tactics of the Russians and what tactics they use in the region. We do regular information exchange about negative actors. We have developed a good basis for adversary narratives. Since 2020, we have started to focus not only on the activities of the Russians, but also on the Chinese in the region. Sharing information is key. The goals of the adversaries are similar for every country. The idea is to coordinate to counter them,” assessed Svetoka.
According to Katarina Klingova, Senior Research Fellow at GLOBSEC, Slovakia, building resistance is a process, something that needs to be facilitated by both the state and civil society.
“Non-governmental organizations can do the most work, they are more flexible, they have different platforms and cooperation. We need the cooperation of all state actors. We need to create space for experts to share their experience. Some do, but some don’t have the space,” Klingova said.
A Dutch expert, on the other hand, spoke about the importance of analyzing and sharing lessons learned.
“We share information so that policymakers can build policies. Lessons need to be learned, analyzed, and shared. Understanding is extremely important. Then comes flexibility and multi-discipline,” emphasized Laura Jasper, Strategic Analyst, HCSS, Netherlands .
“Russian disinformation wants to justify its occupation and present itself as defenders. This rhetoric continues today. We need to focus on the countries that Russia is targeting. Analyze Russia’s narratives, monitor the technologies used to share malicious information, and create networks and collaborations of fact-checking organizations. Authorities must also cooperate and block these messages that threaten public safety. The goal is not only to expose fake news channels, but also to punish them, although that is difficult,” said, among other things, Sonya Dimitrova-Martinyuk, Editor of StopFake, from Ukraine.
Fact-checkers, journalists, researchers, policymakers and civil society leaders from across the Western Balkans and Europe will gather in Skopje today and tomorrow, as part of an international conference organized by the Metamorphosis Foundation, to share lessons learned and experiences in combating disinformation, and to work on creating a network that will serve as a platform to combat malicious fake news and educate the public on how to protect themselves from it.

Bardhyl Jashari, Executive Director of the Metamorphosis Foundation | Photo: Vancho Dzambaski

The lack of legal and institutional mechanisms to protect the digital space in the Balkans makes the region vulnerable to manipulation, disinformation, and foreign influence. While the European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA) establishes clear rules for greater transparency and accountability of online platforms, countries in the region still lack a similar regulatory framework.
The collective fight against disinformation is not just about correcting falsehoods. It focuses on preserving our democratic societies in which citizens make decisions and debate based on arguments. The fight focuses on strengthening media literacy at all levels, making societies resilient to external influences and interference. Today, fact-checking is under attack, and with it, democracy. This was highlighted at today’s conference titled “Together for Truth: Whole-of-Society Approach to Safeguard Democracy,” held in Skopje and organized by the Metamorphosis Foundation in celebration of International Fact-Checking Day, April 2.”
The conference was opened by Ben Nupnau, Deputy Head of Delegation of European Union in North Macedonia, Stephan Mundges, Coordinator of the European Fact-Checking Standards Network (EFCSN), and the Director of the Metamorphosis Foundation, Bardhyl Jashari.
“Metamorphosis is an example in Macedonia and beyond in the fight against disinformation. With your work, you are fighting against the erosion of democratic values. In the EU, we have mechanisms to combat disinformation with the Digital Services Act and the European Media Freedom Act. The online platforms we have are transparent and independent journalism is spread through them. We are with you when it comes to greater protection of journalists and fact-checkers. This conference is an opportunity to exchange practices and strengthen our efforts to preserve democracy and independent media outlets,” said Nupnau, Deputy Head of Delegation of the European Union in North Macedonia.
Stephan Mundges, Coordinator of the European Fact-Checking Standards Network (EFCSN), stressed that it is everyone’s task to strengthen democracy and continue the fight against the spread of disinformation.
“To be lied to and manipulated is to not be free. We meet here in a time of crisis. Fact-checking is under attack, and with it democracy. These attacks come from the East, but they are also starting to come from the West. Political pressure from the United States is making major American technology companies withdraw from the fight against disinformation. Meta’s program is not perfect, but it is the best fact-checking program on a major social network. It does not remove content, but checks for truthfulness. About 95 percent of users who see those tags do not click on the post, because they do not want to see false content. If Meta stops using fact-checking, Europe will be more vulnerable, and the income of fact-checkers will decrease. Meta is not the only one withdrawing, but also TikTok, Microsoft, and Google,” Mundges emphasized.
He added that fact-checkers are under attack in the Western Balkans and that there are unfounded raids and investigations against them and that the situation is not great. Mundges highlighted the police raid on the offices of the civil society organization CRTA from Serbia, which is also a member of the EFCSN.
“What can we change? Fact-checkers will not disappear, we have a big project, with which we will work to strengthen our pan-European network for all relevant stakeholders, because the work of fact-checkers is invaluable and it remains to function independently of political influence,” added Mundges.
The Executive Director of the Metamorphosis Foundation, Bardhyl Jashari, spoke about the need for urgent harmonization of the regulatory framework of Balkan countries with the principles of the Digital Services Act.
“Western Balkan countries still lack the necessary legal, technical, and institutional safeguards to protect people’s rights online. Unlike the EU, we do not benefit from the protection offered by the Digital Services Act, yet we all live in the same digital space. This creates a dangerous gap in the security and integrity of the Internet in Europe. We therefore call for the urgent alignment of the regulatory framework of Balkan countries with the principles of the Digital Services Act and the creation of a strong regional framework for information integrity,” Jashari said.
He noted that citizens from the Western Balkans are significantly exposed to harmful and illegal content on the Internet and that disinformation is everywhere–infiltrating political discourse, undermining trust, and distorting reality.
“Meanwhile, social media platforms, especially the so-called big online platforms, continue to profit from algorithms and amplify disagreements and misinformation, while being largely irresponsible in our region,” Jashari added.
Soren Liborius, Chief Advisor at the European External Action Service (EEAS), gave a video address at the conference.
“Disinformation is a core problem that we need to continue to address. In 2015, the heads of EU member states and governments agreed that something had to be done to combat Russian disinformation. Then came the start of the war in Donbas, and all the activities that led to today’s aggression took place, and therefore it was decided that a team should be formed to combat Russia’s ongoing efforts to spread disinformation. The EEAS has a public platform on which we communicate our findings to the public, what are the trends that are present, and how they are related to political developments. We have also developed our own methodology. On the platform euvsdisinfo.eu, we have a database, available to the public, and there are also examples of how the Russian side spreads disinformation,” said Liborius.
The EEAS report on threats from foreign manipulation and interference in information was presented by Chiara Pacenti, Data Analyst, who spoke about FIMI and the threat on a global scale. She noted that Ukraine is the main target when it comes to Russian FIMI attacks, which aim to weaken Western ties, NATO, EU, G7.
Today’s all-day international conference focuses on the threats of disinformation, foreign manipulation and interference (FIMI), electoral integrity, fact-checking and cross-sectoral cooperation. In Tirana, an evening forum “Democracy Matters–Facts Matter” will be held, organized by the Faktoje Center. The forum will highlight the fact-checking landscape in Albania, as well as regional cooperation, and will honor journalistic excellence with the Fatos Baxhaku Award.
Author: Antonija Popovska

On March 28, 2025, the final conference of the Digital Activism Program was held. The conference was held in Warsaw, Poland, with the participation of over 100 civic activists, representatives of civil society organizations and experts in the field of digitalization and the use of innovative tools. The Digital Activism Program was a three-year project of TechSoup Global, and the Metamorphosis Foundation was a partner in implementing activities in North Macedonia, Serbia and Kosovo.
Through the Digital Activism Program, 18 grants were implemented to support civil society in North Macedonia, Serbia and Kosovo, more than 100 participants were part of trainings on cybersecurity, data visualization, community building, and public communication, as well as recognizing and preventing disinformation. As part of the Digital Activism Program, two editions of the Megaphone international conference were held, where 15 participants from the Western Balkans had the opportunity to meet, network, and learn from experts in the field of artificial intelligence, communication techniques, and preventing disinformation. 47 short videos were prepared and published on topics of media literacy, open data, cybersecurity and cyber hygiene, as well as artificial intelligence.
The Digital Activism Program was aimed at increasing the capacities of civil society organizations from North Macedonia, Serbia, and Kosovo, through introduction to innovative technological tools for work, training in cybersecurity and disinformation recognition, mentoring aimed directly at the specific needs of the organizations, and building support networks.

📊 From Statistical Data to Effective Policies!
Today, we held the workshop “From Statistical Data to Creating Effective Economic and Development Policies”, with a focus on gender statistics, in collaboration with the State Statistical Office (MakStat / MakStat). 👥
🔍 Together with representatives from all relevant institutions, we explored:✔️ The available data from the State Statistical Office✔️ Their utilization in research analyses and Finance Think’s models✔️ The possibilities for integrating findings into policymaking
🎯 Our goal: To ensure that data serve as the foundation for evidence-based policymaking – for more inclusive and equitable development!
Supported by British Embassy Skopje
A special thanks to the Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Labor and Social Policy, Ministry of Education and Science, Ministry of Health, Employment Agency of North Macedonia, Ministry of Energy, Mining, and Mineral Resources, UNICEF MK, and UN Women Skopje for their participation.
#EvidenceBasedPolicies #GenderStatistics #EconomicDevelopment #FinanceThink #MakStat
📸 More photos: https://www.flickr.com/…/fosim/albums/72177720324734083/

Since February 2025, our team has been actively working with the residents of the village of Ropotovo, as part of the initiative to improve energy efficiency and sustainable living. In addition to the advisory sessions at the premises of the Municipality of Dolneni, together with the local population, we conducted individual assessments of the energy efficiency of their homes and business buildings. The assessments were carried out using a specially developed questionnaire, which allowed for a precise analysis of the current situation.

As a result of this fieldwork, we developed and assigned 4 individual energy efficiency plans for households in the community. These plans contain specific recommendations for improving insulation, reducing energy losses and optimal use of renewable sources, in order to reduce costs and improve the quality of life.

👉 “With this plan, we finally know what we can improve and how to save. We got ideas that we never thought could make such a difference to our bills and heat at home.” — says one of the residents of Ropotovo, a participant in the initiative.The activities will continue in the coming period, with the expansion of assessments and the development of plans for other households in the village. With this, the Green Resource Hub continues to be a partner of communities for a more sustainable, more economical and healthier environment.

The activity is part of the project: “Smart Green Village for a Sustainable Future”, which is implemented with the support of the Open Society Foundations – Western Balkans.

The Macedonian Center for International Cooperation (MCIC) has implemented its regular survey of trust in the civil society. In 2024, the index of trust in the civil sector reached 42.9%, which is an 8.2 percentage points drop compared to 2021. The trust in civil society organizations is 39.4%, with a significant…