Dear President von der Leyen,Dear Executive Vice-President Ribera,Dear Executive Vice-President Virkkunen,
We, the undersigned civil society organisations, trade unions and businesses, urge you to resistpolitical pressure from Big Tech companies and prioritise bold action to protect our democracyand economy. If the EU wants to uphold its sovereignty it must not pause or weaken theenforcement of its rules.
We have observed with increasing concern how the CEOs of US Big Tech companies have takenturns to ingratiate themselves with the Trump administration in part to mobilise it against EUrules such as the Digital Markets Act (DMA), competition policy and the Digital Services Act(DSA).
The CEO of Meta, Mark Zuckerberg, has publicly stated that the company would seek to workwith President Trump to undermine laws in the EU, directly targeting the DSA but alsocompetition policy enforcement. Similarly, Apple CEO Tim Cook has reportedly petitioned Trumpdirectly to spare him the fines imposed by the EU following a state aid investigation.
We are relieved to hear you remain fully committed to the strict application of the DSA and DMAand to enforcing those rules wherever companies do not comply in full, following press reportsthat suggested the Commission was considering pausing ongoing investigations.
The undersigned organisations re-emphasise in the strongest possible terms that enforcing theDSA, DMA and competition policy is essential for protecting people from the worst abusesonline, for shielding our democracies against foreign interference, for creating opportunities forEuropean innovators, for preserving media pluralism, and limiting the dangerous political andmarket power that Big Tech corporations hold today. We reiterate our support for theCommission services that do the day-to-day enforcement work and we call on you to take bolddecisions based on their assessments.
Yet, this time shows more than ever before that to rein in Big Tech the EU also needs to invest intechnology that enables a more diverse and decentralised digital public sphere.
Pausing enforcement would be to admit defeat in your work to make the digital sphere fair and safe
Big Tech CEOs trying to curry favour with the US administration is no surprise. In fact, Big Techcompanies have achieved their immense market dominance in part by wielding their power toavoid complying with laws such as data protection and competition policy in the past. They haveall heavily lobbied against the EU’s use of competition tools and the DMA since the proposal wasfirst discussed. Apple and Meta also tried to block DMA enforcement with legal actions againstthe Commission questioning their gatekeeper status.
Now Big Tech CEOs are seeking to mobilise the Trump administration to protect their ability toexploit users and businesses dependent on them, including app developers, publishers,advertisers, and others, all while continuing to stifle potential competitors. This exploitation hasnot only created an unfair digital economy; it has directly impacted the dynamism and pluralismof Europe’s economy.
Re-introducing contestability, fairness and choice to the digital market will already be a difficulttask. If we pause or weaken enforcement, we risk making it impossible.
Europe must not be bullied by the likes of Musk and Trump into weakening its DSA and DMAenforcement
At the same time, the actions taken by X and Meta are a stark reminder of how vulnerableEurope is in our dependency on the largest online platforms.
X in particular has been in violation of its obligations under the DSA for some time, as underlinedby the Commission’s own preliminary findings. The way Musk and his oligarch allies use theplatform for anti-democratic political propaganda, lies, and targeted harassment, is a seriousthreat to our democracy and political discourse in Europe. We are deeply worried about thepower they now wield through the algorithmic manipulation machine that underpins X’s socialmedia feeds.
Meta recently announced a major watering down of their content moderation approach acrosstheir platforms. This change abolishes some of the most basic human rights protections,expressly allowing the targeting of marginalised communities and emboldening extremists. Whilethose changes have been announced to apply to US users first, Facebook, Instagram and Threadsare global platforms. US-based, English-language content will inevitably be seen and shared byEEA users as well, and these users are very likely to experience the fallout of this degradation ofcontent moderation. They will rightly ask how the DSA protects them.
Now is the time to double down on EU tech sovereignty
This is not a clash between the EU and the US, but rather an attack from Big Tech againsteveryone else.
That is why we ask you today for bold political leadership to not only stand up to the bullyingfrom Big Tech firms but also to prioritise strong enforcement of the digital rulebook. In addition,we call on you to invest in a diverse and decentralised digital sphere that is part of a sovereigndigital commons and not owned and governed by proprietary technology corporations,regardless of where they reside.
Yours sincerely,
‘NEVER AGAIN’ Association, PolandAccess Now, GlobalAlgorithmWatch, GermanyAspiration, USAvaaz, GlobalBalanced Economy Project, GlobalBürgerbewegung Finanzwende, GermanyCenter for Countering Digital Hate, US/UKCorporate Europe Observatory, EUCommons Network, the NetherlandsCryptee, EstoniaDanes je nov dan, SloveniaDefend Democracy, Netherlands/BelgiumDemocracy Reporting International (DRI), GlobalDigital Action, GlobalDigitale Gesellschaft, SwitzerlandDržavljan D / Citizen D, SloveniaEKŌ, USEuropean Public Services Union (EPSU), EUEuropean Digital Rights (EDRi), EUFEMNET, GermanyGermanwatch e.V., GermanyGoliathwatch, GermanyGong, CroatiaHomo Digitalis, GreeceIrish Council for Civil Liberties, IrelandLobbycontrol, GermanyMatrix.org Foundation, UKMetamorphosis Foundation, North MacedoniaNextcloud, GermanyOpen Markets Institute, USPanoptykon Foundation, PolandPeople vs Big Tech, GlobalPolitiscope, CroatiaRebalance Now, GermanySHARE Foundation, SerbiaSOMO, the NetherlandsThe Good Lobby, EUThe London Story, Belgium / the NetherlandsTransnational Institute (TNI), the NetherlandsVrijschrift.org, NetherlandsXnet, Institute for Democratic Digitalisation, Spain